Fred Medart Manufacturing Co. v. Rafferty

243 A.D. 632
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 632 (Fred Medart Manufacturing Co. v. Rafferty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fred Medart Manufacturing Co. v. Rafferty, 243 A.D. 632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order granting plaintiff’s motion in a replevin action to permit it to offer proof of the value of chattels and upon determination of their value to resettle the judgment entered upon a stipulation or agreement of settlement, and order fixing the value of the chattels and resettling the judgment, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motions denied, with ten dollars costs. The judgment was entered upon a stipulation or agreement of settlement which has not been set aside or modified. The court was without power to resettle the judgment so as to change it in matter of substance and alter its legal effect. (Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N. Y. 323.) The plaintiff is not without remedy. It may move to be relieved from its stipulation and to vacate the judgment entered thereon if it can show facts which would entitle it to such relief. (Ladd v. Stevenson, 112 N. Y. 325; Hatch v. Central National Bank, 78 id. 487.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National City Bank v. Elsky
62 Misc. 2d 880 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1970)
U. S. Auto Radiator Co. v. Meyers
36 Misc. 2d 127 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Gittlitz v. Lewis
29 Misc. 2d 134 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-medart-manufacturing-co-v-rafferty-nyappdiv-1935.