Fred Mabery v. James Martin, Frank Nuzum, Aaron Johnson, Pat Seavouras
This text of 829 F.2d 36 (Fred Mabery v. James Martin, Frank Nuzum, Aaron Johnson, Pat Seavouras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
829 F.2d 36
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Fred MABERY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James MARTIN, FRANK NUZUM, Aaron Johnson, Pat Seavouras,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7070
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 29, 1987.
Decided September 9, 1987.
Fred Mabery, appellant pro se.
Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.
Before CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Mabery v. Martin, C/A No. 86-341-CRT (E.D.N.C., Mar. 2, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
829 F.2d 36, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12012, 1987 WL 44790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-mabery-v-james-martin-frank-nuzum-aaron-johns-ca4-1987.