Fred Earl Ingerson, III v. State
This text of Fred Earl Ingerson, III v. State (Fred Earl Ingerson, III v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00311-CR
FRED EARL INGERSON, III APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. CR11514
OPINION AND ORDER
Justice Sue Walker’s motion for the court to hear this appeal en banc was
considered by the entire court. See Tex. R. App. P. 41.2(c), 47.5. A majority of
the court voted not to hear the appeal en banc. Therefore, the motion is denied.
DATED October 27, 2016.
PER CURIAM PUBLISH
EN BANC
WALKER, J., dissents to the denial of en banc hearing; LIVINGSTON, C.J., and GABRIEL, J., join.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fred Earl Ingerson, III v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-earl-ingerson-iii-v-state-texapp-2016.