Fred Clayworth v. County of Luzerne

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fred Clayworth v. County of Luzerne. Read the opinion of the Court — 513 F. App'x 134
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 15, 2013·No. 11-4593·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 11-4593 ___________

FRED CLAYWORTH, individually and as parent and natural guardian of G.H.,

Appellant

v.

LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA; LUZERNE COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES; FRANK CASTANO; JOSEPH KLOSS; JOHN KOSLOSKI; TARA MCCUTCHEON; WILMA SNOPEK; JOANNE VAN SAUN

Before: FUENTES, HARDIMAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges

ORDER

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion and judgment filed February 5, 2013 is hereby VACATED, and a new opinion and judgment will issue forthwith.

By the Court,

/s/ JANE R. ROTH Circuit Judge

Dated: May 15, 2013

Tnh/cc: All Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fred Clayworth v. County of Luzerne, (3d Cir. 2013).

Fred Clayworth v. County of Luzerne (Fred Clayworth v. County of Luzerne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.