Fred C. Holland v. U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
This text of 637 F. App'x 263 (Fred C. Holland v. U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Minnesota resident Fred Holland appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his pro se complaint alleging that the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs erroneously cut off his worker’s compensation benefits and fired him. After careful de novo review, see Riley v. United States, 486 F.3d 1030, 1031 (8th Cir.2007) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction), we conclude that dismissal was appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of The Honorable Becky . R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
637 F. App'x 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-c-holland-v-us-dept-of-veterans-affairs-ca8-2016.