Fred B. Cooper Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Fred B. Cooper Co. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 315, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 752

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 27, 1950

DocketNo. 55045; protests 146420-K and 146645-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Cust. Ct. 315 (Fred B. Cooper Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fred B. Cooper Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 315, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 752 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of hams and similar pork products in tins the same in all material respects-as those involved in Axel Stokby et al. v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358). [316]*316In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was "held that 10 percent allowance should be made for the weight of the gelatinous material surrounding the merchandise contained in the tins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of hams and similar pork products in tins the same in all material respects-as those involved in Axel Stokby et al. v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358). [316]*316In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was "held that 10 percent allowance should be made for the weight of the gelatinous material surrounding the merchandise contained in the tins.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Cust. Ct. 315, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-b-cooper-co-v-united-states-cusc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack