Frechette v. Ruane

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 3, 1996·No. 96-1103·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion



[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 96-1103

MAUREEN F. FRECHETTE,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

PAUL RUANE, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Maureen F. Frechette on brief pro se. ____________________
Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Marci __________________ _____
R. Gelb, Counsel, Department of Correction, on brief for appellee. _______

____________________

DECEMBER 3, 1996
____________________

Per Curiam. Upon a careful review of the issues __________

and arguments in the parties' briefs and the record presented

on appeal, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. ________

See Loc. R. 27.1. ___

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frechette v. Ruane, (1st Cir. 1996).

Frechette v. Ruane (Frechette v. Ruane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.