Frear v. L. Barth & Son

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frear v. L. Barth & Son

233 A.D. 654

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 654 (Frear v. L. Barth & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frear v. L. Barth & Son, 233 A.D. 654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended supplemental complaint within ten days from service of order upon payment of said costs and ten dollars costs of motion at Special Term. No opinion. Present — Finch, Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.; Finch and Sherman, JJ., dissent on the ground that a cause of action in quantum meruit is stated against the corporate defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended supplemental complaint within ten days from service of order upon payment of said costs and ten dollars costs of motion at Special Term. No opinion. Present — Finch, Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.; Finch and Sherman, JJ., dissent on the ground that a cause of action in quantum meruit is stated against the corporate defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frear-v-l-barth-son-nyappdiv-1931.