Frazier v. . Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Frazier v. . Young

145 S.E. 921, 196 N.C. 814, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 418

DecidedNovember 28, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.E. 921 (Frazier v. . Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frazier v. . Young, 145 S.E. 921, 196 N.C. 814, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 418 (N.C. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action for the recovery of a lot in the city of Charlotte, the boundaries of which are set out in the complaint. The defendant filed an answer denying the plaintiffs’ allegations and pleading adverse possession for twenty years and for seven years under color of title. The jury returned a verdict to the effect that the plaintiffs are the owners of the land described in the third and fourth paragraphs of the complaint, and that the defendant has not had such adverse possession as would defeat the plaintiff’s title. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs and the defendant excepted and appealed.

We have given to each of the exceptions a careful investigation and are of opinion that they present no sufficient ground for a new trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action for the recovery of a lot in the city of Charlotte, the boundaries of which are set out in the complaint. The defendant filed an answer denying the plaintiffs’ allegations and pleading adverse possession for twenty years and for seven years under color of title. The jury returned a verdict to the effect that the plaintiffs are the owners of the land described in the third and fourth paragraphs of the complaint, and that the defendant has not had such adverse possession as would defeat the plaintiff’s title. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs and the defendant excepted and appealed.

We have given to each of the exceptions a careful investigation and are of opinion that they present no sufficient ground for a new trial.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 S.E. 921, 196 N.C. 814, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-young-nc-1928.