Frazier v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

6 A.3d 1288, 607 Pa. 373, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2536
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 29, 2010
Docket627 EAL 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 A.3d 1288 (Frazier v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frazier v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 6 A.3d 1288, 607 Pa. 373, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2536 (Pa. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether Section 23 of [Act 44, Act of July 2, 1993, P.L. 1990,] provides sovereign immunity from subrogation and/or reimbursement claims sought against an employee who has entered into a third[-]party settlement with a Commonwealth Party such as Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”).
Additionally, we direct the parties to address the purposes and practical application of Section 23 under the Workers’ Compensation Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frazier v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
52 A.3d 241 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Mitman Ex Rel. City of Easton v. Police Pension Commission
6 A.3d 1288 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.3d 1288, 607 Pa. 373, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-workers-compensation-appeal-board-pa-2010.