Frazier v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Frazier v. Wainwright

255 So. 2d 291

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 10, 1971

DocketNo. 70-1076

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 So. 2d 291 (Frazier v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frazier v. Wainwright, 255 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s original direct appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed upon conviction of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and petit larceny was frustrated by an untimely filed notice of appeal by court appointed counsel.

We grant petitioner a belated review of the judgment and sentence equivalent to a direct appeal by means of this habeas corpus proceeding. Henninger v. State, Fla.1970, 230 So.2d 149.

We have heard and considered oral argument of counsel for the respective parties, examined the briefs and record, and conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed and habeas corpus denied.

Habeas corpus denied.

REED, C. J., CROSS, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI