Frazier v. Venen

17 P. 885, 3 Wash. Terr. 392, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 8
Washington Territory·Decided January 25, 1888·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Turner

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellees move to dismiss the appeal in the above cases, because appellant has failed to file or serve an assignment of errors.

We are of opinion that the motion must prevail. There is nothing in the complaint or answer to make the case one of equitable cognizance. The orders and judgments of the District Court, in actions at law, cannot be reviewed in this court without an assignment of errors. (Brown et al. v. Hazard, 2 Wash. 464.)

Let the appeal be dismissed.

Jones, C. J., Allyn J., and Langford, J,, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. Venen, 17 P. 885, 3 Wash. Terr. 392, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 8 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1888).

17 P. 885 (Frazier v. Venen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Insurance v. Meesman
27 P. 77 (Washington Supreme Court, 1891)