Frazier v. Ulta Beauty Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedFebruary 10, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-01608
StatusUnknown

This text of Frazier v. Ulta Beauty Inc. (Frazier v. Ulta Beauty Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frazier v. Ulta Beauty Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 JULIAN BURNS KING, Bar No. 298617 julian @ kingsiegel.com 2 || ELLIOT J. SIEGEL, Bar No. 286798 3 elliot @kingsiegel.com ROBERT J. KING, Bar No. 302545 4 robert @ kingsiegel.com KING & SIEGEL LLP 5 || 724 South Spring Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90017 6 Telephone: (213) 419-5101 7 Facsimile: (213) 289-2815 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff SARAH FRAZIER ? BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731 19 || bblackburn @littler.com NATHANIEL H. JENKINS, Bar No. 312067 11 nenkins @littler.com NICHOLAS W. MCKINNEY, Bar No. 322792 12 nmckinney @littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 13 500 Capitol Mall Suite 2000 14 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.830.7200 15 Facsimile: 916.561.0828 16 Attorneys for Defendant ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, 17 INC. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SARAH FRAZIER, an individual, No. 2:20-cv-01608-TLN-DB Plaintiff, AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 22 ORDER v. 23 ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & 24 || FRAGRANCE, INC., a Delaware 95 corporation and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendant. 26 27 28 P.C AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Case No. 2:20-cv-01608-TLM-DB

een nn ene en en nn nn ne ne OE OS I OO mE

1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 3 || proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 4 || for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties 5 || hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 6 || acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 7 || discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 8 || information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 9 || The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective 10 || Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth 11 || the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks 12 || permission from the court to file material under seal. 13 || 2. DEFINITIONS 14 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information 15 || or items under this Order. 16 2.2. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 17 || generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 18 || Civil Procedure 26(c). 19 2.3 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: 20 || extremely sensitive “‘Confidential’ Information or Items” whose disclosure to another Party or non- 21 || party would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive 22 || means. 23 2.4 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well 24 || as their support staff). 25 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 26 || produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 27 || CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 28 AMENDED STIPULATED 2. Case No. 2:20-cv-01608-TLM-DB

enn nnn ene en en ne on nn nn nO OI ON I OO EE

1 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 2 || or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 3 || transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 4 || discovery in this matter. 5 2.7. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 6 || litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant 7 || in this action. 8 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel 9 || does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 10 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 11 || entity not named as a Party to this action. 12 2.10 Qutside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action 13 || but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf 14 || of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 15 2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 16 || consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 17 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material 18 || in this action. 19 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 20 || photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, 21 || or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 22 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 23 || “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY'S’ EYES ONLY.” 24 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 25 || Producing Party. 26 || 3. SCOPE 27 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 28 || defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all AMENDED STIPULATED 3. Case No. 2:20-cv-01608-TLM-DB

nnn nn ene en en nn on nnn nn nn OI OS I OO

1 || copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 2 || conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 3 || However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 4 || information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 5 || Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 6 || publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 7 || through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure 8 || or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information 9 || lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected 10 || Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 11 |] 4. DURATION 12 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 13 || Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 14 || otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 15 || defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 16 || and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time 17 || limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 18 |] 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 19 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or 20 || Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit 21 |) any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Frazier v. Ulta Beauty Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-ulta-beauty-inc-caed-2021.