Frazier v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Frazier v. State

504 S.W.3d 137, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2016 WL 6236654

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 2016

DocketWD 78613

StatusPublished

This text of 504 S.W.3d 137 (Frazier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frazier v. State, 504 S.W.3d 137, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2016 WL 6236654 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Appellant Vince Frazier was convicted of first-degree murder and armed criminal action, and sentenced to consecutive terms of life without parole and sixteen years, respectively. Frazier’s convictions arose from the stabbing death of his former girlfriend. After his convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, Frazier filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 29.15. The circuit court denied the motion following an evidentiary hearing. Frazier appeals. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to closing argument by the prosecution which referred to the impact of the victim’s murder on her family. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Appellant Vince Frazier was convicted of first-degree murder and armed criminal action, and sentenced to consecutive terms of life without parole and sixteen years, respectively. Frazier’s convictions arose from the stabbing death of his former girlfriend. After his convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, Frazier filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 29.15. The circuit court denied the motion following an evidentiary hearing. Frazier appeals. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to closing argument by the prosecution which referred to the impact of the victim’s murder on her family. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 S.W.3d 137, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2016 WL 6236654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-state-moctapp-2016.