Frazier v. State

348 S.W.3d 132, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1190, 2011 WL 4038589
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2011·No. ED 95973·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otis C. Frazier appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. State, 348 S.W.3d 132, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1190, 2011 WL 4038589 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

348 S.W.3d 132 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lindsey v. State
348 S.W.3d 132 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)