Frazier v. State

348 S.W.3d 132, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1190, 2011 WL 4038589
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 13, 2011
DocketED 95973
StatusPublished

This text of 348 S.W.3d 132 (Frazier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frazier v. State, 348 S.W.3d 132, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1190, 2011 WL 4038589 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otis C. Frazier appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindsey v. State
348 S.W.3d 132 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 S.W.3d 132, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1190, 2011 WL 4038589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-state-moctapp-2011.