Frazier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Frazier v. State

30 S.E.2d 349, 71 Ga. App. 130, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 295

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 19, 1944·No. 30434.·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was tried on an accusation containing two counts. Count one charged the sale of whisky without a license; count two charged the selling of whisky on a Sunday. He was convicted on both counts. His motion for a new trial was denied, and that judgment is assigned as error. The evidence amply authorized the verdict. Special grounds 2, 3, and 5 of the motion for new trial are expressly abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error; and, under all the facts of the case and the law applicable thereto, the remaining special grounds show no cause for another trial.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was tried on an accusation containing two counts. Count one charged the sale of whisky without a license; count two charged the selling of whisky on a Sunday. He was convicted on both counts. His motion for a new trial was denied, and that judgment is assigned as error. The evidence amply authorized the verdict. Special grounds 2, 3, and 5 of the motion for new trial are expressly abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error; and, under all the facts of the case and the law applicable thereto, the remaining special grounds show no cause for another trial.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Frazier v. State, 30 S.E.2d 349, 71 Ga. App. 130, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 295 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

30 S.E.2d 349 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.