Frazier v. State
This text of 30 S.E.2d 349 (Frazier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was tried on an accusation containing two counts. Count one charged the sale of whisky without a license; count two charged the selling of whisky on a Sunday. He was convicted on both counts. His motion for a new trial was denied, and that judgment is assigned as error. The evidence amply authorized the verdict. Special grounds 2, 3, and 5 of the motion for new trial are expressly abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error; and, under all the facts of the case and the law applicable thereto, the remaining special grounds show no cause for another trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 S.E.2d 349, 71 Ga. App. 130, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-state-gactapp-1944.