Frazier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Frazier v. State

148 S.E. 606, 39 Ga. App. 834, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 580

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 11, 1929

Docket19728

StatusPublished

This text of 148 S.E. 606 (Frazier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frazier v. State, 148 S.E. 606, 39 Ga. App. 834, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 580 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains no special grounds, there is some evidence to support the verdict, and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732). See Journigan v. State, 38 Ga. App. 741 (2) (145 S. E. 500), and eit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., cm id Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains no special grounds, there is some evidence to support the verdict, and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732). See Journigan v. State, 38 Ga. App. 741 (2) (145 S. E. 500), and eit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., cm id Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 S.E. 606, 39 Ga. App. 834, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-state-gactapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack