Frazier v. State

148 S.E. 606, 39 Ga. App. 834, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 580
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 11, 1929·No. 19728·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains no special grounds, there is some evidence to support the verdict, and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732). See Journigan v. State, 38 Ga. App. 741 (2) (145 S. E. 500), and eit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., cm id Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. State, 148 S.E. 606, 39 Ga. App. 834, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 580 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

148 S.E. 606 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toole v. Jones
90 S.E. 732 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Smith v. State
145 S.E. 500 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)