Frazier v. State

184 So. 3d 653, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1646, 2016 WL 455692
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frazier v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17420
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2016·No. No. 1D16-0052·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004) (reiterating that ha-beas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions).

OSTERHAUS, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. State, 184 So. 3d 653, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1646, 2016 WL 455692 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

184 So. 3d 653 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)