Frazier v. State

578 So. 2d 51, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3595, 1991 WL 58881
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frazier v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 587 So. 2d 660
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1991·No. No. 90-00055·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of robbery and appeals his conviction contending that there was insufficient evidence of the element of using “force, violence or assault or putting in fear.” § 812.13(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). The appellee concedes the error. Therefore, we reverse the appellant’s conviction and sentence for robbery and, in [52]*52accordance with section 924.34, Florida Statutes, remand with directions to the trial court to adjudicate the appellant guilty of the necessarily lesser included crime of petit theft and to resentence the appellant accordingly.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and LEHAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. State, 578 So. 2d 51, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3595, 1991 WL 58881 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

578 So. 2d 51 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.