Frazier v. State
This text of 292 P. 1116 (Frazier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of the crime of murder in the second degree, and has appealed to this court. No brief has been filed on his behalf, but we have examined the record for fundamental error. The information properly charges the offense of which the defendant was convicted and the verdict of the jury found him guilty thereof. The minutes show that the proceedings on the trial were in all respects regular and according to law. While some of the instructions given were not applicable *Page 260 to the crime charged by the information, it is apparent from the record that the error was in no sense prejudicial.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 P. 1116, 37 Ariz. 259, 1930 Ariz. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-state-ariz-1930.