Frazier v. State

82 So. 526, 203 Ala. 276, 1919 Ala. LEXIS 226
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 30, 1919
Docket2 Div. 695.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 82 So. 526 (Frazier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frazier v. State, 82 So. 526, 203 Ala. 276, 1919 Ala. LEXIS 226 (Ala. 1919).

Opinion

*277 PER CURIAM.

Section 13 of the aet of' 1919, p. 13, in providing for the seizure and forfeiture of vehicles, says, “which have been or are used for the illegal conveying of prohibited liquors or beverages.” The proof in this case fails to show that the automobile in question had been used or was being used at the time of seizure in illegally conveying liquors or beverages so as to bring it under the forfeiture provision of the statute. The decree of the circuit court is reversed, and one is here rendered dismissing the state’s petition.

Reversed and rendered.

All the Justices concur, except THOMAS, J.} who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Underwood v. State
132 So. 606 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)
Clements v. State Ex Rel. Sanford
89 So. 545 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Carey v. State Ex Rel. Almon
89 So. 609 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
One Black Mule v. State
85 So. 749 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
State Ex Rel. Tate v. One Lexington Automobile
84 So. 297 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 526, 203 Ala. 276, 1919 Ala. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-state-ala-1919.