Frazier v. S&ME, Inc.
This text of Frazier v. S&ME, Inc. (Frazier v. S&ME, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-00594-M-RJ
ALICIA FRAZIER, Plaintiff,
V. ORDER S&ME, INC., RACHEL TZORTZIS, and MEREDITH L. KEYES, Defendants.
This matter comes before the court on an Amended Complaint filed as a matter of course by the Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.'! DE 16. “Ordinarily, an amended complaint supersedes those that came before it.” Goodman v. Diggs, 986 F.3d 493, 498 (4th Cir. 2021) (citing Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 572 (4th Cir. 2001)). In light of Plaintiffs filing, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 11] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot.
SO ORDERED this 2 day of January, 2024. ed ELV pus t Ss RICHARD E. MYERS II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 Plaintiff avers that, in the Amended Complaint, she “has sufficiently alleged all of the required elements to support each of its claims and has met the requirement of a notice pleading.” DE 17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frazier v. S&ME, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-sme-inc-nced-2024.