Frazier v. Repass
This text of 547 F. App'x 210 (Frazier v. Repass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Erma Frazier appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of the remaining Appellees in accordance with the jury’s verdict on Frazier’s claim of retaliation and directing judgment in favor of the Appellees on Frazier’s claims of race and age discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and deny Frazier’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
547 F. App'x 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-repass-ca4-2013.