Frazier v. Potter

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 14, 2012·No. Misc. No. 2010-0555·Published

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 4 2 FoR THE DISTRICT oF coLUMB1A Cc:en<, U_S Dism_ t 012 °vrrs for fha oisrcnc& Ba"k'”"‘° t°f Coinmg;yé, LARRY FRAZIER, JR., Plaintiff,

v. Misc. Action No. lO-555

JOHN E. POTTER,

\./\./§/S/\./&/§/§/§/

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has denied plaintiffs motion to use a post office box as his mailing address, and to date he has filed no other document to state a basis for his request. Accordingly, the

Court will deny the pending motions and dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. z?u C- UniteduStates District Judge

DATE; g/'°//>

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. Potter, (D.D.C. 2012).

Frazier v. Potter (Frazier v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.