Frazier v. Potter

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedAugust 14, 2012
DocketMisc. No. 2010-0555
StatusPublished

This text of Frazier v. Potter (Frazier v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frazier v. Potter, (D.D.C. 2012).

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 4 2 FoR THE DISTRICT oF coLUMB1A Cc:en<, U_S Dism_ t 012 °vrrs for fha oisrcnc& Ba"k'”"‘° t°f Coinmg;yé, LARRY FRAZIER, JR., Plaintiff,

v. Misc. Action No. lO-555

JOHN E. POTTER,

\./\./§/S/\./&/§/§/§/

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has denied plaintiffs motion to use a post office box as his mailing address, and to date he has filed no other document to state a basis for his request. Accordingly, the

Court will deny the pending motions and dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. z?u C- UniteduStates District Judge

DATE; g/'°//>

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Frazier v. Potter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-potter-dcd-2012.