Frazier v. Palisades Realty and Amusement Company
171 A. 795, 112 N.J.L. 502, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 302
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae,' Well's, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frazier v. Palisades Realty and Amusement Company, 171 A. 795, 112 N.J.L. 502, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 302 (N.J. 1934).
171 A. 795 (Frazier v. Palisades Realty and Amusement Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.