Frazier v. Palisades Realty and Amusement Company
171 A. 795, 112 N.J.L. 502, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 302
This text of 171 A. 795 (Frazier v. Palisades Realty and Amusement Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Frazier v. Palisades Realty and Amusement Company, 171 A. 795, 112 N.J.L. 502, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 302 (N.J. 1934).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae,' Well's, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 A. 795, 112 N.J.L. 502, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-palisades-realty-and-amusement-company-nj-1934.