Frazier v. Murray

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJanuary 14, 1998
DocketI.C. No. TA-14582
StatusPublished

This text of Frazier v. Murray (Frazier v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frazier v. Murray, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1998).

Opinions

Upon review of the plaintiff's pleadings and the applicable law, the undersigned conclude that the defendants have shown good grounds to reconsider and reverse the aforesaid order; therefore, the Full Commission hereby enters the following

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The defendants' motion pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), (2), (4), (5) and (6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure should be allowed.

Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the Full Commission enters the following

ORDER
1. The order of Commissioner Ballance filed herein on August 21, 1997 is hereby reversed.

2. The defendants' motion pursuant to Rules 12 (b) (1), (2), (4), (5) and (6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure is hereby allowed.

3. The plaintiff's claim is hereby dismissed.

4. Each side shall pay its own costs.

S/ ________________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/ ______________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

DISSENTING:

S/ ______________________ CIIRISTOPHER L. SCOTT COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Frazier v. Murray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-murray-ncworkcompcom-1998.