Frazier v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

D.C. Circuit

Frazier v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

253 F. App'x 43

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 18, 2007

DocketNo. 06-1040

StatusPublished

This text of 253 F. App'x 43 (Frazier v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frazier v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, 253 F. App'x 43 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States Tax Court and on the briefs and supplement filed by the parties. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the United States Tax Court filed October 14, 2005, be affirmed. Appellant has not identified any error in the Tax Court’s holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue had not abused his discretion in ordering a levy on appellant’s assets.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States Tax Court and on the briefs and supplement filed by the parties. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the United States Tax Court filed October 14, 2005, be affirmed. Appellant has not identified any error in the Tax Court’s holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue had not abused his discretion in ordering a levy on appellant’s assets.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 F. App'x 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-service-cadc-2007.