Frazier v. Bates

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Frazier v. Bates

317 S.W.2d 887, 1958 Ky. LEXIS 113

Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided May 23, 1958·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are affirming the judgment fixing the boundary line between the properties of the parties, as contended for by the appellee, ■defendant below, because we think the trial ■court reached a proper determination of the case. The motion for a new trial on the iground of newly discovered evidence was ■properly overruled.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, .and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are affirming the judgment fixing the boundary line between the properties of the parties, as contended for by the appellee, ■defendant below, because we think the trial ■court reached a proper determination of the case. The motion for a new trial on the iground of newly discovered evidence was ■properly overruled.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, .and the judgment is affirmed.

Frazier v. Bates, 317 S.W.2d 887, 1958 Ky. LEXIS 113 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

317 S.W.2d 887 (Frazier v. Bates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.