Frazier v. Bates

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Frazier v. Bates

317 S.W.2d 887, 1958 Ky. LEXIS 113

DecidedMay 23, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 317 S.W.2d 887 (Frazier v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frazier v. Bates, 317 S.W.2d 887, 1958 Ky. LEXIS 113 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are affirming the judgment fixing the boundary line between the properties of the parties, as contended for by the appellee, ■defendant below, because we think the trial ■court reached a proper determination of the case. The motion for a new trial on the iground of newly discovered evidence was ■properly overruled.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, .and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are affirming the judgment fixing the boundary line between the properties of the parties, as contended for by the appellee, ■defendant below, because we think the trial ■court reached a proper determination of the case. The motion for a new trial on the iground of newly discovered evidence was ■properly overruled.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, .and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

317 S.W.2d 887, 1958 Ky. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-bates-kyctapp-1958.