Frazier v. Applebaum

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Frazier v. Applebaum

548 So. 2d 1212, 1989 La. LEXIS 2120, 1989 WL 107680

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 18, 1989

DocketNo. 89-CC-2191

StatusPublished

This text of 548 So. 2d 1212 (Frazier v. Applebaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frazier v. Applebaum, 548 So. 2d 1212, 1989 La. LEXIS 2120, 1989 WL 107680 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Frazier, Barbara; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “L”, No. 87-7427; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW-1428.

Granted (in part and denied in part.) The ruling of the courts below (acted on by the court of appeal on September 15, 1989) on the issue of the substitute witness is reversed and plaintiffs are granted the right to use Dr. B.R. Respess as prayed for in their motion of May 25. Defendants will not be prejudiced since they have had Res-pess’ report for “many weeks” according to the dissenting judge of the court of appeal. Otherwise the application is denied.

CALOGERO, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Frazier, Barbara; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “L”, No. 87-7427; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW-1428.

Granted (in part and denied in part.) The ruling of the courts below (acted on by the court of appeal on September 15, 1989) on the issue of the substitute witness is reversed and plaintiffs are granted the right to use Dr. B.R. Respess as prayed for in their motion of May 25. Defendants will not be prejudiced since they have had Res-pess’ report for “many weeks” according to the dissenting judge of the court of appeal. Otherwise the application is denied.

CALOGERO, J., recused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

548 So. 2d 1212, 1989 La. LEXIS 2120, 1989 WL 107680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-applebaum-la-1989.