Frazier Lewis v. Mary Lewis, Now Timothy
This text of 204 F.2d 693 (Frazier Lewis v. Mary Lewis, Now Timothy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
204 F.2d 693
Frazier LEWIS,
v.
Mary LEWIS, now Timothy et al.
No. 4546.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
March 2, 1953.
Young, Young & Young, Sapulpa, Okl., for appellant.
B. H. Tabor, Checotah, Okl., Hunt & Eagleton, Tulsa, Okl., John W. Porter, Muskogee, Okl., Cyrus L. Billings, Tulsa, Okl., William C. Liedtke, Tulsa, Okl., James M. McInerney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, and Reginald W. Barnes, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Edwin Langley, U.S. Atty., and J. W. Crawford, Asst. U.S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl., for appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and KNOUS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed pursuant to stipulation of the parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 F.2d 693, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-lewis-v-mary-lewis-now-timothy-ca10-1953.