Frazier Lewis v. Mary Lewis, Now Timothy

204 F.2d 693, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2498
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 1953
Docket4546
StatusPublished

This text of 204 F.2d 693 (Frazier Lewis v. Mary Lewis, Now Timothy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frazier Lewis v. Mary Lewis, Now Timothy, 204 F.2d 693, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2498 (10th Cir. 1953).

Opinion

204 F.2d 693

Frazier LEWIS,
v.
Mary LEWIS, now Timothy et al.

No. 4546.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

March 2, 1953.

Young, Young & Young, Sapulpa, Okl., for appellant.

B. H. Tabor, Checotah, Okl., Hunt & Eagleton, Tulsa, Okl., John W. Porter, Muskogee, Okl., Cyrus L. Billings, Tulsa, Okl., William C. Liedtke, Tulsa, Okl., James M. McInerney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, and Reginald W. Barnes, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Edwin Langley, U.S. Atty., and J. W. Crawford, Asst. U.S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl., for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and KNOUS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed pursuant to stipulation of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 F.2d 693, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-lewis-v-mary-lewis-now-timothy-ca10-1953.