Frazier, B. v. Phila. Ct. Com. Pl.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 20, 2017·No. Frazier, B. v. Phila. Ct. Com. Pl. - No. 53 EM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

BRUCE FRAZIER, : No. 53 EM 2017 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (noting that hybrid

representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings

to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier, B. v. Phila. Ct. Com. Pl., (Pa. 2017).

Frazier, B. v. Phila. Ct. Com. Pl. (Frazier, B. v. Phila. Ct. Com. Pl.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)