Frazier, B. v. Phila. Ct. Com. Pl.
This text of Frazier, B. v. Phila. Ct. Com. Pl. (Frazier, B. v. Phila. Ct. Com. Pl.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
BRUCE FRAZIER, : No. 53 EM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (noting that hybrid
representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings
to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frazier, B. v. Phila. Ct. Com. Pl., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-b-v-phila-ct-com-pl-pa-2017.