Frazer v. Public Service Railway Co.
This text of 105 A. 391 (Frazer v. Public Service Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decree is affirmed, with costs. We agree with the vice-chancellor’s construction of the powers vested in the Passaic valley sewerage commissioners and his definition of the word “necessary.” We express no opinion on the question whether the covenants in the contract between the sewerage commissioners and the contractors can avail the complainant.
For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 A. 391, 89 N.J. Eq. 569, 4 Stock. 569, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazer-v-public-service-railway-co-nj-1917.