Frazer v. Linton
This text of 38 A. 589 (Frazer v. Linton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no error in the decree, or in the rulings of the court leading up thereto. The defendant’s offer, covered by the last specification, was rightly excluded for the reason that the proposed testimony was incompetent. On the facts, properly found by the court, there was no error in affirming the points quoted in the first three specifications, or in entering the decree set out at length in the fourth specification.
There is nothing in any of the questions presented by the record that requires, discussion.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 A. 589, 183 Pa. 186, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazer-v-linton-pa-1897.