Frazer v. Inhabitants of Lewiston

76 Me. 531, 1884 Me. LEXIS 113
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided December 18, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Haskell, J.

This is an action on the case against Lewiston, brought by the father to recover damages for the loss of the life of his minor son, caused by a defective and unsafe street.

Towns are liable for damages suffered from defective public ways, only, when an action is given by statute. Mitchell v. The City of Rockland, 52 Maine, 118 ; Mower v. Leicester, 9 Mass. 247; Sawyer v. Inhbts. of Northfield, 7 Cush. 490.

[532] R. S., c. 18, sec. 80, gives such action to the executor or ¡administrator of the person whose life has been lost through such (defect, but does not give the father such remedy; nor does the ¡action accrue or survive to him, either at common law, or by ¡statute.

Exceptions sustained. Declaration adjudged had,

Peters, C. J., Walton, Virgin, Llbbey and Emery, JJ., «concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazer v. Inhabitants of Lewiston, 76 Me. 531, 1884 Me. LEXIS 113 (Me. 1884).

76 Me. 531 (Frazer v. Inhabitants of Lewiston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cooke
148 A. 385 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1930)