Frawley v. Stradtmann

New York Supreme Court

Frawley v. Stradtmann

200 Misc. 202, 108 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591

DecidedJune 22, 1951

StatusPublished

This text of 200 Misc. 202 (Frawley v. Stradtmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frawley v. Stradtmann, 200 Misc. 202, 108 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Bartels, J.

This is an application to remove a negligence action now pending in the City Court, Bings County, to this court and for other related relief. The City Court action was instituted by the service of a summons without a complaint. By stipulation, the time for plaintiffs to serve a complaint has been extended to June 25,1951.

It is asserted that upon a careful study of X rays taken subsequent to the service of a summons, it appears that the injuries sustained are of a more serious character than those indicated by the original cursory examination. This is substantiated by the affidavit of the physician. Under all the circumstances herein, plaintiffs are entitled to the relief sought (Civ. Prac. Act, § 110-a; Morris v. Perlman, 145 Misc. 892, affd. 237 App. Div. 857; Matter of Kimmel, 58 N. Y. S. 2d 681).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartels, J.

This is an application to remove a negligence action now pending in the City Court, Bings County, to this court and for other related relief. The City Court action was instituted by the service of a summons without a complaint. By stipulation, the time for plaintiffs to serve a complaint has been extended to June 25,1951.

It is asserted that upon a careful study of X rays taken subsequent to the service of a summons, it appears that the injuries sustained are of a more serious character than those indicated by the original cursory examination. This is substantiated by the affidavit of the physician. Under all the circumstances herein, plaintiffs are entitled to the relief sought (Civ. Prac. Act, § 110-a; Morris v. Perlman, 145 Misc. 892, affd. 237 App. Div. 857; Matter of Kimmel, 58 N. Y. S. 2d 681).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 Misc. 202, 108 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frawley-v-stradtmann-nysupct-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack