Frawley v. Stradtmann

200 Misc. 202, 108 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 1951·Published

Opinion

Bartels, J.

This is an application to remove a negligence action now pending in the City Court, Bings County, to this court and for other related relief. The City Court action was instituted by the service of a summons without a complaint. By stipulation, the time for plaintiffs to serve a complaint has been extended to June 25,1951.

It is asserted that upon a careful study of X rays taken subsequent to the service of a summons, it appears that the injuries sustained are of a more serious character than those indicated by the original cursory examination. This is substantiated by the affidavit of the physician. Under all the circumstances herein, plaintiffs are entitled to the relief sought (Civ. Prac. Act, § 110-a; Morris v. Perlman, 145 Misc. 892, affd. 237 App. Div. 857; Matter of Kimmel, 58 N. Y. S. 2d 681).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frawley v. Stradtmann, 200 Misc. 202, 108 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1951).

200 Misc. 202 (Frawley v. Stradtmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. Perelman
237 A.D. 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Morris v. Perlman
145 Misc. 892 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)