Frates v. State

145 So. 3d 931, 2014 WL 4087437, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12746
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 2014·No. No. 2D14-1017·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Hinson v. State, 57 So.3d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); McCutcheon v. State, 44 So.3d 156 (Fla. [932]*9324th DCA 2010); Brown v. State, 10 So.3d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

KELLY, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frates v. State, 145 So. 3d 931, 2014 WL 4087437, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12746 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

145 So. 3d 931 (Frates v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
10 So. 3d 1197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Bizzell v. State
912 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
McCutcheon v. State
44 So. 3d 156 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Hinson v. State
57 So. 3d 865 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)