Frates v. Odestash Taxi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frates v. Odestash Taxi, Inc.

199 A.D.2d 464, 608 N.Y.S.2d 104

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 1993·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for personal injuries, the defendant Odestash Taxi, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated September 23, 1991, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3103, inter alia, to preclude the plaintiffs from deposing various nonparty witnesses in California.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion for a protective order (see, DeAddio v Putnam Hosp. Ctr., 196 AD2d 804). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for personal injuries, the defendant Odestash Taxi, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated September 23, 1991, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3103, inter alia, to preclude the plaintiffs from deposing various nonparty witnesses in California.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion for a protective order (see, DeAddio v Putnam Hosp. Ctr., 196 AD2d 804). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Frates v. Odestash Taxi, Inc., 199 A.D.2d 464, 608 N.Y.S.2d 104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

199 A.D.2d 464 (Frates v. Odestash Taxi, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related