Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Miami

143 So. 3d 953, 2014 WL 2753871, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9220

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 18, 2014

DocketNo. 3D13-2437

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 So. 3d 953 (Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Miami, 143 So. 3d 953, 2014 WL 2753871, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. Dep’t of Revenue v. City of Gainesville, 918 So.2d 250, 256 (Fla.2005) (“[A] determination that a statute is facially unconstitutional means that no set of circumstances exists under which the statute would be valid.”); Headley v. City of Miami, 118 So.3d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that the City of Miami did not commit unfair labor practices by unilaterally modifying the collective bargaining agreement pursuant to section 447.4095 of the Florida Statutes); see also Hollywood Fire Fighters, Local 1375, IAFF, Inc. v. City of Hollywood, 133 So.3d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding implicitly in an as applied challenge that the use of the term “financial urgency” in section 447.4095 is not unconstitutionally vague; certifying conflict on other grounds with Headley).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. Dep’t of Revenue v. City of Gainesville, 918 So.2d 250, 256 (Fla.2005) (“[A] determination that a statute is facially unconstitutional means that no set of circumstances exists under which the statute would be valid.”); Headley v. City of Miami, 118 So.3d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that the City of Miami did not commit unfair labor practices by unilaterally modifying the collective bargaining agreement pursuant to section 447.4095 of the Florida Statutes); see also Hollywood Fire Fighters, Local 1375, IAFF, Inc. v. City of Hollywood, 133 So.3d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding implicitly in an as applied challenge that the use of the term “financial urgency” in section 447.4095 is not unconstitutionally vague; certifying conflict on other grounds with Headley).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 So. 3d 953, 2014 WL 2753871, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraternal-order-of-police-v-city-of-miami-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack