Fraternal Aid Union v. Whitehead

88 So. 274, 125 Miss. 661
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fraternal Aid Union v. Whitehead. Read the opinion of the Court — 125 Miss. 153
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1921·No. No. 21472·Published

Opinion

Ethridge, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a motion filed by the appellant to transfer, the suggestion of error to the court in, Txmc on the ground that the effect of the previous decision (87 So. 453) is to destroy section 20 of chapter 206, Laws of 1916, on the ground that it is unconstitutional. Counsel misunderstood the decision heretofore rendered. It does not hold section 20 of chapter 206, Laws 1916, void, nor does it impair or abridge that section. The trouble is that section 106 of the constitution and by-laws of the appellant does not conform to what is authorized by section 20 of chapter 206, Laws 1916. The section of the constitution of appellant is much broader than what is authorized by the statute of the state above quoted. This court, when working in divisions, will not transfer a suggestion of error to the court in banc at the instance of the litigant. It will do so of its own motion when it seems to it proper to do so.

Overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fraternal Aid Union v. Whitehead, 88 So. 274, 125 Miss. 661 (Mich. 1921).

88 So. 274 (Fraternal Aid Union v. Whitehead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fraternal Aid Union v. Whitehead
87 So. 453 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)