Fratelli Branca & Co. v. Pagliaro

36 F. Supp. 344, 48 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 29, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2276
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania·Decided December 17, 1940·No. No. 1145 Civil·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GIBSON, District Judge.

The complainant alleges infringement of its trade-mark and unfair competition, and has moved for a preliminary injunction.

Despite the. fact that it made out a prima facie case by the evidence produced upon the hearing upon said motion, the court feels that the motion must be refused. The function of a preliminary injunction is to maintain the status quo, and a temporary injunction would have the opposite effect. If violations of plaintiff’s trade-mark exist, and continue, plaintiff' may recover damages therefor on final hearing (which the court will list for an early date in January next upon application therefor).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fratelli Branca & Co. v. Pagliaro, 36 F. Supp. 344, 48 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 29, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2276 (W.D. Pa. 1940).

36 F. Supp. 344 (Fratelli Branca & Co. v. Pagliaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

G. F. Heublein & Bro. v. Bushmill Wine & Products Co.
39 F. Supp. 549 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1941)