Fratelli Branca & Co. v. Pagliaro
This text of 36 F. Supp. 344 (Fratelli Branca & Co. v. Pagliaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complainant alleges infringement of its trade-mark and unfair competition, and has moved for a preliminary injunction.
Despite the. fact that it made out a prima facie case by the evidence produced upon the hearing upon said motion, the court feels that the motion must be refused. The function of a preliminary injunction is to maintain the status quo, and a temporary injunction would have the opposite effect. If violations of plaintiff’s trade-mark exist, and continue, plaintiff' may recover damages therefor on final hearing (which the court will list for an early date in January next upon application therefor).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F. Supp. 344, 48 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 29, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fratelli-branca-co-v-pagliaro-pawd-1940.