Frasier & Frasier v. Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Court

1993 OK 108, 859 P.2d 1098, 64 O.B.A.J. 2835, 1993 Okla. LEXIS 130, 1993 WL 366517
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 16, 1993·No. No. 81951·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[1099]*1099ORDER

HODGES, Chief Justice.

Original jurisdiction is assumed and a writ of prohibition is issued to prohibit the Workers’ Compensation Court from proceeding further in a dispute over which it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. Title 85 O.S. Ch. 4, App., Rule 34. Rule 34 limits the Workers’ Compensation Court to deciding two disputes regarding attorney fees: (1) identity of counsel of record and (2) the allocation of fees among successive counsel. The issue here involves a law firm’s dispute over allocation of fees under a complex financial agreement between associated attorneys concerning a share of net profits in a multi-member law firm. The Workers’ Compensation Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to determine the rights, relationships, and money due under such contractual arrangements now in litigation in a district court action. Subject to further modification by order of the District Court, petitioner law firm shall deposit all fees awarded by the respondent-court in a trust account whose distribution shall await the end or settlement of the dispute between affected counsel.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frasier & Frasier v. Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Court, 1993 OK 108, 859 P.2d 1098, 64 O.B.A.J. 2835, 1993 Okla. LEXIS 130, 1993 WL 366517 (Okla. 1993).

1993 OK 108 (Frasier & Frasier v. Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GARRETT v. BELL
2024 OK CIV APP 13 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2023)
Scruggs v. Edwards
2007 OK 6 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2007)
Grennan v. Bonray Drilling
1998 OK CIV APP 65 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1998)