Fraser v. Trent

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah

Fraser v. Trent

74 F. 423, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2703

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah

DecidedApril 20, 1896

DocketNo. 8

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F. 423 (Fraser v. Trent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fraser v. Trent, 74 F. 423, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2703 (circtdut 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

ADAMS, District Judge

(orally). There is no controversy but what the application for transfer of this case to this court was made later than the time when, under the removal act, it should have been made. But for the reasons stated in the case of Crown Point Min. Co. v. Ontario Silver-Min. Co., 74 Fed. 419, I hold that such fact presents no legal objection to the transfer of this case to this court, under the enabling act of congress and the constitution of Utah. The motion to remand is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ADAMS, District Judge

(orally). There is no controversy but what the application for transfer of this case to this court was made later than the time when, under the removal act, it should have been made. But for the reasons stated in the case of Crown Point Min. Co. v. Ontario Silver-Min. Co., 74 Fed. 419, I hold that such fact presents no legal objection to the transfer of this case to this court, under the enabling act of congress and the constitution of Utah. The motion to remand is therefore denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F. 423, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraser-v-trent-circtdut-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack