Fraser v. State Board of Education

42 A.2d 269, 133 N.J.L. 15, 1945 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 30, 1945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The op inion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

1. Do teachers in a school system, who have acquired tenure, have a right to the increases provided by an existing- salary schedule when the time for such increases occur? We think not. If the reasoning in Greenway v. Board of Education of Camden, 129 N. J. L. 461, is somewhat extended, as we think it should be, board action is necessary to implement every increase.

2. May the recommendation by the persons named in the schedule be arbitrarily withheld ? We can find nothing in the proofs beyond inaction. There is nothing to indicate that it was arbitrary. To decide otherwise it is admitted would necessitate overruling the reasoning in the Greenway case, supra. This we cannot do.

The judgment of the State Board of Education will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fraser v. State Board of Education, 42 A.2d 269, 133 N.J.L. 15, 1945 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 130 (N.J. 1945).

42 A.2d 269 (Fraser v. State Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kopera v. West Orange Bd. of Education
158 A.2d 842 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)