Fraser v. Goode

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Fraser v. Goode

37 S.C.L. 199

DecidedMay 15, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 37 S.C.L. 199 (Fraser v. Goode) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fraser v. Goode, 37 S.C.L. 199 (S.C. Ct. App. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia, per

Harper, J.

As I understand the case, Roberts sold the negro woman, and paid the money he received to the holder of the note on which he was surety for Allen. This money he was liable to pay, and on his doing so, the law raised an implied contract in Allen to reimburse him. It was implied that he had paid the money at Allen’s instance and request. The motion is granted.

Johnson and O’Neall, JJ. concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia, per

Harper, J.

As I understand the case, Roberts sold the negro woman, and paid the money he received to the holder of the note on which he was surety for Allen. This money he was liable to pay, and on his doing so, the law raised an implied contract in Allen to reimburse him. It was implied that he had paid the money at Allen’s instance and request. The motion is granted.

Johnson and O’Neall, JJ. concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 S.C.L. 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraser-v-goode-scctapp-1832.