Fraser v. Fraser

169 A. 688, 115 N.J. Eq. 122, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 731
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 5, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 169 A. 688 (Fraser v. Fraser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fraser v. Fraser, 169 A. 688, 115 N.J. Eq. 122, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 731 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tren chard, Parser, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A. 688, 115 N.J. Eq. 122, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraser-v-fraser-nj-1934.