Franz v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Third Circuit

Franz v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

891 F.2d 280, 1989 WL 146762

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 1989

Docket89-3191

StatusPublished

This text of 891 F.2d 280 (Franz v. Raymark Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franz v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 891 F.2d 280, 1989 WL 146762 (3d Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

891 F.2d 280

Franz (Patricia) Estate of Franz (Charles)
v.
Raymark Industries, Inc., The Celotex Corp., Philip
CareyMfg. Co., Philip Carey Corp., Briggs Mfg. Co., and/or
Panacon Corp., Keene Building Products Corp., Eagle- Picher
Industries, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Armstrong
World Industries, Inc., Atlas Asbestos Corp., Ltd., Forty
Eight Insulations, Inc., Gaf Corp., Pittsburgh Corning
Corp., Combustion Engineering, Inc., Refractory and
Insulation, A.C. & S., Inc.

NO. 89-3191

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

NOV 16, 1989

Appeal From: W.D.Pa.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI