Franz Rosenthal, Inc. v. Tannhauser

109 N.E.2d 470, 304 N.Y. 812

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 1952·Published

Opinion

304 N.Y. 812 (1952)

In the Matter of the Arbitration between Franz Rosenthal, Inc., Respondent, and Kurt Tannhauser, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 15, 1952. Decided November 20, 1952

Emanuel Tacker and Michael Koses for appellant.

Myron J. Greene and Chester Inwald for respondent.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, and FROESSEL, JJ. Taking no part: FULD, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

304 N.Y. 812 (1952)

In the Matter of the Arbitration between Franz Rosenthal, Inc., Respondent, and Kurt Tannhauser, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 15, 1952. Decided November 20, 1952

Emanuel Tacker and Michael Koses for appellant.

Myron J. Greene and Chester Inwald for respondent.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, and FROESSEL, JJ. Taking no part: FULD, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Franz Rosenthal, Inc. v. Tannhauser, 109 N.E.2d 470, 304 N.Y. 812 (N.Y. 1952).

Pincite

109 N.E.2d 470 (Franz Rosenthal, Inc. v. Tannhauser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Arbitration between Franz Rosenthal, Inc. & Tannhauser

109 N.E.2d 470 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)