Franz Rosenthal, Inc. v. Tannhauser
109 N.E.2d 470, 304 N.Y. 812
This text of 109 N.E.2d 470 (Franz Rosenthal, Inc. v. Tannhauser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Franz Rosenthal, Inc. v. Tannhauser, 109 N.E.2d 470, 304 N.Y. 812 (N.Y. 1952).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Franz Rosenthal, Inc., Respondent, and Kurt Tannhauser, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Emanuel Tacker and Michael Koses for appellant.
Myron J. Greene and Chester Inwald for respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, and FROESSEL, JJ. Taking no part: FULD, J.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re the Arbitration between Franz Rosenthal, Inc. & Tannhauser
109 N.E.2d 470 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
109 N.E.2d 470, 304 N.Y. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franz-rosenthal-inc-v-tannhauser-ny-1952.