Franxman v. Franxman
This text of Franxman v. Franxman (Franxman v. Franxman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-1457 _____________________________
TAREYTON JOSEPH FRANXMAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ELIZABETH ANN FRANXMAN,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
October 2, 2024
PER CURIAM.
The Court grants the petition for writ of prohibition and quashes the trial court order vacating and setting aside the order of disqualification. See Miller v. Bell S. Phone Co., 860 So. 2d 523, 523 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
LEWIS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Ross A. Keene, Pensacola, for Petitioner.
Andrew D. Wheeler of The Wheeler Firm, PA, Niceville, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Franxman v. Franxman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franxman-v-franxman-fladistctapp-2024.