FRANTZIS v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

FRANTZIS v. State

80 So. 3d 1133, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3321, 2012 WL 676319

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 2, 2012

Docket1D11-2034

StatusPublished

This text of 80 So. 3d 1133 (FRANTZIS v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

FRANTZIS v. State, 80 So. 3d 1133, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3321, 2012 WL 676319 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, J.

Appellant challenges a final order of civil commitment under the Jimmy Ryce Act, sections 394.910-932, Florida Statutes (2007). Section 394.916(1) provides the court shall conduct a trial within 30 days after the determination of probable cause. Section 394.916(2) states the court may grant one continuance for “not more than 120 days.” Appellant argues the limit on continuances in subsection (2) is jurisdictional. He asserts that because he was not brought to trial within 150 days of the probable cause determination, the trial court lost subject matter jurisdiction over the proceedings. Therefore, he argues, he is entitled to a dismissal of the civil commitment action with prejudice.

In State v. Goode, 830 So.2d 817 (Fla.2002), the supreme court found the 30 day provision in subsection (1) was not jurisdic *1134 tional. We find no reason to treat the 120 day provision in subsection (2) differently. Moreover, below appellant twice filed a waiver of his right to trial within 30 days of the probable cause determination, and much of the delay in the proceedings was attributable to him. We, therefore, find no merit in appellant’s contentions.

We also determine the other issues he raised are without merit. Therefore, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, J.

Appellant challenges a final order of civil commitment under the Jimmy Ryce Act, sections 394.910-932, Florida Statutes (2007). Section 394.916(1) provides the court shall conduct a trial within 30 days after the determination of probable cause. Section 394.916(2) states the court may grant one continuance for “not more than 120 days.” Appellant argues the limit on continuances in subsection (2) is jurisdictional. He asserts that because he was not brought to trial within 150 days of the probable cause determination, the trial court lost subject matter jurisdiction over the proceedings. Therefore, he argues, he is entitled to a dismissal of the civil commitment action with prejudice.

In State v. Goode, 830 So.2d 817 (Fla.2002), the supreme court found the 30 day provision in subsection (1) was not jurisdic *1134 tional. We find no reason to treat the 120 day provision in subsection (2) differently. Moreover, below appellant twice filed a waiver of his right to trial within 30 days of the probable cause determination, and much of the delay in the proceedings was attributable to him. We, therefore, find no merit in appellant’s contentions.

We also determine the other issues he raised are without merit. Therefore, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 So. 3d 1133, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3321, 2012 WL 676319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frantzis-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack