Frantzeskos Pavgouzas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
This text of 341 F.2d 920 (Frantzeskos Pavgouzas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
341 F.2d 920
Frantzeskos PAVGOUZAS, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
No. 15012.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Feb. 16, 1965.
Decided March 2, 1965.
J. J. Kilimnik, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Sullivan Cistone, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., Maurice A. Roberts, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
341 F.2d 920, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frantzeskos-pavgouzas-v-immigration-and-naturaliza-ca3-1965.